Therefore, sharing bicycles now requires big data collection and application, and more accurate delivery. On the other hand, in the case of low quality consumers, it is necessary to strengthen management, such as timely recovery and repair of damaged vehicles, to improve the integrity of road vehicles as much as possible; for those who are used by some people, they are no longer used by others. The vehicle used by the person should be tracked and checked. If it is locked up privately, then you can warn first, unlock the lock, and the second time the same problem occurs, you must manage the person like black, and in the same industry. Share these blacklists.

　　从情感上说，我认为能去做共享单车这门生意的人，都是有情怀的人，哪怕其中有些人是直接奔着赚钱去的，但至少是主观为自己，复古私服，客观为他人吧？至少是有愿意关心、改善民众生活的想法吧？否则为啥要进这样一个受累难管的新行业来当试验品？这样的人，值得我们每一个受到其恩惠的人，用自己的行动投下自己的赞成票！

　　In short, with the support for new things, things that are conducive to people's livelihood, and more inclusive, I really don't understand what those people who have to queue up to return the deposit in the winter are thinking. Since the deposit card was opened at the beginning, it still needs to be used. Since it is used, the refund of the deposit will be less of an option, and if you withdraw, the company is likely to survive. In fact, at the current price, let alone 100 yuan, that is, 500 yuan can not buy a serious bicycle! Everyone who needs us, invests a small amount of money, supports the process of development of this enterprise, and is also investing in a better quality of life for themselves. Why not?

　　This is not the unwarranted seizure of the consumer's funds, but the cost of the necessary maintenance of the property's integrity as a result of the company's transfer of property rights. Just as you rent a house with a complete home appliance and you need to collect a deposit. It is a very reasonable behavior to pay a deposit at the hotel. I really don't understand that some media have to spray such basic business rules for Qilian. Is it unfamiliar to all new things?

　　看点

　　更没有想明白的一个道理是：如果医保是国家财政出钱补贴药品，而生产药品的企业是国家的，那么国家不让药企赚钱，不是可以省下一笔巨大的医药开支吗？药企赚钱国家只收一点税，但是医保支出就高很多。这样一想，我要是国家的管理者，我估计还是让药企的利润为零比较合算吧？

　　Maybe you won't get your own 99 yuan, but isn't it a very meaningful thing for a company to get through the difficulties because of your support?

　　In fact, I wrote this content yesterday, but I forgot to save it. As a result, WORD originally had a very reliable way to close the file and reminded that the saved dialog box did not pop up, but after editing it, how is it less? Big section? It’s really no effort to write it again at this time, and the time is quite late, so I have to write it again today.

　　所以，先不要太激动，一审就毙了快一半，修改后能否满足道德委员会们集体的道德感，那也不是容易的事。所以，游戏还是没有新戏出来。

　　要是玩腻了，还是洗洗睡吧！

　　So, don't be too excited, the first trial will be halfway through, and it will not be easy to meet the collective morality of the moral committee after the revision. Therefore, the game still has no new drama.

　　在说股票基金之前，昨天特别想说的是小黄车OFO北京总部遭遇用户退押金的事情。

　　今日医药股还是一路大跌，基本无药可救 ，别管是中药西药，通通不灵，而且什么生物疫苗、血液制品也都提不起精神，甚至连医疗保健都跟着下跌。从上海的数据来看，医保带量的采购影响还是很大的，在带量采购之前，每年的采购量才2个亿，今年一带量，升到40个亿了，增长了20倍，难怪企业降价9成也要中标。估计能有这个增长量，经营会爽很多。